Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

address@hidden wrote:

> Hi,
>
> since i destroyed the messages about this subject i have to create a new
> one.
>
> I installed the last testing debian version on a dreamlinux small
> laptop. This version of exmacs runs as fast as the 1.0.6.9 version i
> have on my desktop with gnome-etch. I wasreally pleased, because when i
> first tried texmacs a last year, it was to slow on my poor laptop ...
>
> By the way, when installing this testing version; i thought it would
> depend on texlive and not tetex (as it is stated when i want to upgrade
> my etch 1.0.6.9 version), but with dreamlinux (wihc is between stable
> and testing), it relies on tetex. Is it normal ?
>
> Marc

In Debian testing we currently have 1.0.6-11 which depends upon tetex.
However, from 1.0.6.9-3 onwards we updated the dependencies from tetex to
texlive [1]. Currently Debian unstable contains 1.0.6.10 which also depends
upon texlive.

raju

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418660

--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://malayamaarutham.blogspot.com/

---

• texmacs' speed and debian packages, address@hidden, 05/25/2007
  • Re: [TeXmacs] texmacs' speed and debian packages, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi, 05/27/2007
    • Re: [TeXmacs] texmacs' speed and debian packages, address@hidden, 05/27/2007

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.