- From: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
- To: Andreas Seidl <address@hidden>
- Cc: <address@hidden>, Paulo Jorge de Oliveira Cantante de Matos <address@hidden>
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Logical Frameworks [Was: Interfacing texmacs with Isabelle]
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 10:51:28 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003, Andreas Seidl wrote:
>
> 1) Write parsers and pretty printers for sufficiently customizable
>
> mathematical grammars.
>
>
Does this mean "MathML"?
This should mean "content MathML" and probably "Openmath".
As to, "presentation MathML", that should be done by David Allouche.
>
> Of course, any help and suggestions are welcome. In any case,
>
> if the question is whether it is possible and whether we want to support
>
> logical frameworks and whether, then the answer is definitely: yes.
>
>
Coq and Isabelle seem to be proof assistants for higher-order logic. The
>
system I'm working with, REDLOG, is for first-order logic with fixed
>
languages and theories (including propositional calculus). I've done
>
some prettyprinting recently, as can be seen in two screenshots and some
>
example slides (done with texmacs) at
>
http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~seidl/software/
Seems nice! Notice that we may include improvements for the reduce plugin
directly into TeXmacs if you wish (in that case you should contact Andrey
Grozin too: address@hidden).
>
maybe there are some points where this first-order stuff overlaps with the
>
theorem-proving stuff; in this case it would be nice if progress was made
>
not too secretly.
You may all suscribe to texmacs-dev and we can discuss technical details
there.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.