mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>]

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Álvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
> > We all agree even though we should try to push publishers harder at
> > supporting TeXmacs as a native format. We start to a have some contacts
> > at Springer-Verlag, but it would really be helpful to always insist on
> > sending papers in the native TeXmacs format.
>
> This is really the right way in my opinion. TeXmacs is not a "secondary
> format". The only quirk is that it has still to achieve the
> platform-independence of LaTeX..., Joris, do you have an estimate on
> when will the native windows version be merged with the current code?

It has already been merged, but it is only an alpha-version.
Maybe Springer-Verlag will finance Dan Martens in order to
finish the Windows port. Or maybe a philantropist is willing
to give us the necessary 6000 euros.