Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Daniel Brockman wrote:

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #12200 (project texmacs):

I second this request.

_______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=12200>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/

It is not a perfect solution, but one can assemble
several integral signs using superpose. The example
in the attached files demonstrates this. The next
step would be to write a macro for the different
multiple integral sign (double and triple only ?).

Best, Henri
<TeXmacs|1.0.6>

<style|article>

<\body>
\;

<equation|<with|mode|text|<with|mode|math|<superpose|<big|int>| <big|int>|
\ \ \ \
<big|int>><rsub|x<rsup|2>+y<rsup|2>+y<rsup|2>\<leqslant\>R<rsup|2>>(x
+y+z)\<mathd\>x\<mathd\>y\<mathd\>z>>>
</body>

<\initial>
<\collection>
<associate|page-type|letter>
<associate|preamble|false>
</collection>
</initial>

---

• Re: [bug #12200] Double Integral as a variant of Integral, Henri Lesourd, 05/16/2006

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.