Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : "Mike Hansen" <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] SAGE
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:41:54 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NqKWGDH9QYBMayIe/mdez6nt0UwXVpNCMfls38e6eqKLSVCv/wmh1SRloDHvbi9LybsrTn61AEcq7oz8dSn8otU4ggosLNQVePsj6pUW4Kkal6dtoZiwR2yD3zpCVEel9kwIDx2Tviv55QQ2M1DsR9Uf3DBIbAKKgpZJPdOr9Zo=
Hello,
> Just to confirm that I know about the initiative.
I don't think anyone who works on Sage considers it to be a competitor
to TeXmacs. Sage is a computer algebra system which also happens to
be able interact with other CASs.
> This is also my opinion. I would actually support anoyone who
> would be interested in making a really good SAGE interface.
> However, the SAGE people seem rather interested in the development
> of WEB interfaces. So be it.
I would be very happy if there was a good TeXmacs interface to Sage.
The reason why a web interface was initially created was because it
was seen as the quickest, cross-platform way to get a GUI. The Sage
notebook is actually one of the least developed areas of the program
since most people are really interested in implementing mathematics
functionality. I don't think that it has actively been worked on for
about 6 months. There have been approximately 30 releases of Sage
since then.
Since Sage is just a Python library, I envision there being multiple
interfaces for it in the future.
--Mike
- Re: [TeXmacs] SAGE, Joris van der Hoeven, 12/03/2007
- Re: [TeXmacs] SAGE, Mike Hansen, 12/03/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.