mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Gubinelli Massimiliano <address@hidden>]

The weird thing is that scheme export does indeed export the ket macro even 
if it is not defined. I think LaTeX export could just do the same. Actually 
the macro  is already  disapeared when the document arrives to the LaTex 
export routines.

best
max


On 18 sept. 2010, at 14:46, Joris van der Hoeven wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Gubinelli Massimiliano wrote:
>> The following simplified document
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> <TeXmacs|1.0.7.6>
>> 
>> <style|article>
>> 
>> <\body>
>>  <\hide-preamble>
>>    <include|./texmacs_macros/macro_definitions.tm>
>> 
>>    \;
>>  </hide-preamble>
>> 
>>  The ket <ket|\<psi\>> will not export to tex.
>> </body>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> produce the following call to the texmacs->latex scheme routine in 
>> TeXmacs/progs/convert/latex/tmtex.scm
> 
> I obtain the following LaTeX export:
> 
> --------------
> \documentclass{article}
> 
> 
> 
> 
> \begin{document}
> 
> 
> 
> The ket   will not export to tex.
> 
> \end{document}
> --------------
> 
> This is perfectly normal, since 'ket' is not defined in the document.
> I am not sure what happens to the include if the file is present.
> Maybe we indeed have to do something, also when you provide your
> own style packages.
> 
> However, this is power usage: a simple remedy is to simply put
> your macros in the preamble.
> 
> Best wishes, --Joris