mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Evan Chou <address@hidden>]

Hi,

 

I want to try some of these shortcuts out. Where do I put the keyboard-efficient-edit.scm? I tried putting it in the same folder as the my-init-texmacs.scm.  Sorry if I'm missing something obvious.

Evan

On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden> wrote:

Dear all,

just for reference (see previous thread), here are a few shortcuts I
have been using for the last few years and that proved quite helpful.
They were developed with Klaus Hornberger during 2005; I have removed
those that are not anymore so useful in the present status of TeXmacs
or which do not produce well-structured mathematics.

I hope you find them useful!

file keyboard-efficient-edit.scm, to be loaded as

(lazy-keyboard (keyboard kbd-efficient-edit) always?)

from .TeXmacs/progs/my-init-texmacs.scm



-----------
;++ redefinition of important keys
(texmacs-module (keyboard kbd-efficient-edit)
 (:use
   (math math-edit))
   (table table-edit))

(kbd-map
 (:mode in-text?)

;-- Delete by words
 ("S-delete" (begin (kbd-select traverse-right) (clipboard-cut "ternary")))
 ("S-backspace" (begin (kbd-select traverse-left) (clipboard-cut "ternary")))

;-- <C-Return> inserts equation array
 ("C-return"  (begin (make 'eqnarray) (temp-proof-fix)))


(kbd-map
 (:mode in-math?)
;-- Easy movement in equations
;;
;; <return> moves to the right, ie, leaves superscripts etc.
;; (except in labels, hybrids,..)
;; and <space> produces a logical multiplicaton
 ("return" (if (or (inside? 'hybrid) (inside? 'label)
                   (inside? 'phantom) (in-prog?))
               (begin (kbd-return))
               (begin (go-right))))
 ("C-return" (if (or (table-inside? 'eqnarray) (table-inside? 'eqnarray*)
                     (inside? 'equation) (inside? 'equation*))
                 (begin (kbd-end-line) (go-right) )  ;  leave math environment
                (begin (kbd-return))                ; should be default setting
))

;; Double minus makes unary minus

 ("- -" "<um>")

;;Simplified products

 ("space" "*")
 ("space var" " ")  ; same as S-space

;; <$> switches to text mode

 ("$" (make-with "mode" "text"))

;; this would be cool; probably requires binding these key names
;; (obtained from xev) to TeXmacs-recognized keynames; see
;; config-kbd.scm

 ("XF86Forward" structured-exit-right)
 ("XF86Back" structured-exit-left)

)

---------END OF FILE-----------

-á.



On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 18:03, Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Alvaro,
>
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 08:32:48AM +0100, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
>> > Checking some of my existing documents made me discover several typos,
>> > which could have been corrected, so if the semantic mode is not
>> > too much of a burden, then it actually has some immediate advantages.
>> > Not to speak about CAS interfaces.
>>
>> I understand now. However for most people /invisible typos/ won't be an issue.
>
> The typos captured by the semantic modes are not necessarily invisible,
> even though invisible typos are among the most frequent ones.
>
>> > The number of Ctrl-Spaces will probably not increase.
>> > In the formula "a+b+c+d", I was thinking of outward selecting
>> > "a+b-c+d" right after, say "b" (anyway, the decision between "a+b"
>> > and "b-c" would not be clear). On the other hand, you should be
>> > able to select "a+b", "b-c", "a+b-c", "b-c+d" and "a+b-c+d"
>> > using the mouse or S-left, S-right (but not "c+d").
>>
>> Above you mention that selecting x*y in 1/x*y is not selectable by
>> default - do you mean that semantic mode has to be deactivated for
>> that to work? because it is not possible now even with S-Left and
>> S-Right.
>
> Yes, you should either 1) deactivate it, 2) place x*y inside invisible
> brackets right from the start. Indeed, semantically speaking,
> x*y is *not* a valid subexpression of 1/x*y (similarly,
> /x is not a valid subexpression of 1/x*y).
>
>> In the documentation it doesn't speak about how to create the
>> invisible parentheses.
>
> Yes, this should be detailed.
>
>> (btw. it may become instructive to at some
>> point have an option to have all invisible characters displayed for
>> example in light grey, the way some word processors allow showing
>> carriage returns).
>
> Agreed.
>
>> > That might indeed be a good idea inside mathematical formulas.
>> > And if we want to leave on the left? S-enter?
>>
>> Could be. I am not trained to leave on the left
>
> That would be required in order to treat subscripts and superscripts
> using the same system.
>
>> >> > At the very start of TeXmacs, I experimented
>> >> > markup for subscripts and superscripts with their base and found it
>> >> > less natural than the current solution.
>> >>
>> >> I don't understand what was the difference. But they are fine now,
>> >> it's only entering multiple indexes that is annoyingly long.
>> >
>> > Maybe I should add structured-up and structured-down inside subscripts?
>>
>> How would this help with the indexes as in a_{ijk}? But yes, I am for
>> all sorts of structured navigation. I guess up goes to subscript owner
>> and down to further (possible) scripts?
>
> I misunderstood you; I was thinking about adding a superscript
> after typing a subscript.
>
>> >> ',,' indeed is an excellent compromise.
>> >
>> > We might also use A-, by the way (or C-, depending on the OS).
>>
>> I tend to prefer ,,  ,it seems faster to me than A- or C-
>
> It might actually even be better to use "space" as a toggle
> to make the adjacent character invisible (whenever applicable).
>
> Best wishes, --Joris
>