Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : "Adrian S." <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Plain Bibliogrpahy is broken.
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:50:32 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=w6UEWlxI37VrzAPS97Q1EUYMyHnGrdKW3JSMXk59ToWQPvJgCwoE1GR4NiPBAWw7Qd k2DzisFugRkjtgveiRlUpbarzbi4lulhxHWIh55i/jpltz/xvMu5iv6El8ucTh5/VSYQ kzDpJ9bWYjsijvp6CmCJSpVfoRWmslSCu9ifs=
I have the same problem. I tried to use a bibliography and got the same error. Changing to plain instead of tm-plain did solve the problem.
Thanks!
-Adrián.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:31 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Kostas Oikonomou wrote:
Are you running bibtex style tm-plain or plain?I have 1.0.7.10, and bibliography works fine. Keep in mind that bibtex is *independent* of TeXmacs. Problems with bibtex have nothing to do with TeXmacs. The LaTeX manual (Leslie Lamport) explains how to use bibtex.
I think I have it kinda figured out.
I conjecture the style "tm-plain" uses the new TeXmacs native BibTeX parsing, while the style "plain" uses the old BibTeX parsing.
Switching to style "plain" works.
However, this means there has been a new bug introduced into version 1.0.7.10 breaking the native TeXmacs BibTeX parsing.
--Russell O'Connor <http://r6.ca/>
``All talk about `theft,''' the general counsel of the American Graphophone
Company wrote, ``is the merest claptrap, for there exists no property in
ideas musical, literary or artistic, except as defined by statute.''
- Re: [TeXmacs] Plain Bibliogrpahy is broken., Adrian S., 04/26/2011
- Re: [TeXmacs] Plain Bibliogrpahy is broken., Adrian S., 04/26/2011
- Re: [TeXmacs] Plain Bibliogrpahy is broken., Adrian S., 04/26/2011
- Re: [TeXmacs] Plain Bibliogrpahy is broken., Adrian S., 04/26/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.