mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Sam Liddicott <address@hidden>]

I wish that texmacs would control spacing more vigourously and eat consecutive white space and eat empty paragraphs.

Sam

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:46 AM, marc lalaude-labayle <address@hidden> wrote:

So do I. At first i was a bit surprised, but now i'am used to it.

Thanks for all the good work.

Marc

2011/9/30 Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden>

I personally like that TeXmacs automatically takes care of the spacing.

-á.

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 06:36, Joris van der Hoeven
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 04:44:44PM +0200, Jan Lellmann wrote:
>> I noticed that recent versions of Texmacs exhibit a strange
>> behavior: When I type a comma "," in an equation followed by space,
>> the comma disappears. This is quite annoying. Is it intended
>> behavior, and if yes, why?
>
> Yes, this is the intended behaviour.
> The shortcut ", " stands for an invisible comma.
> For instance, "a_i, j" allows you to type the matrix entry $a_{ij}$.
>
> In math mode, users are not intended to manually enter spaces
> around commas or other operators, except if you want to explicitly
> apply a function. The typesetter knows about the amount of whitespace
> to put around commas and operators. In other words, type "f(x,y)"
> and not "f(x, y)"; also type "x+y", not "x + y".
>
> I agree though that the behaviour may seem unnatural;
> maybe I should only activate it in semantic editing mode.
> On the other hand, it is true that spurious commas are
> *THE* major nuisance to parsing math formulas.
> It is really a nasty habit. An alternative would be
> to simply ignore such spaces.
>
> On this occasion, I would re-ask users to try the semantic
> mathematical editing mode (see explantions in the documentation
> on typing mathematical formulas); it remains useful to have
> more feedback on this issue.
>
> Best, --Joris
>