Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : Tim Li <address@hidden>- To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
- Subject: RE: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:04:45 +0000
- Importance: Normal
Thanks, Julien.
In you macro, mm is a absolute length unit. I think we'd better use a rigid font-dependent length unit.
In the TeXbook, Donald Knuth defined the double integral sign as follows:
\def\iint{\int\!\!\!\int}
Here \! which is a negative thin space equals -1/6 \quad with \quad being 1em.
Thus, I want to define a \iint like this (inspired by your macro) :
<assign|iint|<int><space|-0.5emunit>>
What surprised me is that it is as same as \int\int. I don't know why :(
Tim
From: address@hidden
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:01:56 +0100
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign
Actually this is not what I used to do.
In you macro, mm is a absolute length unit. I think we'd better use a rigid font-dependent length unit.
In the TeXbook, Donald Knuth defined the double integral sign as follows:
\def\iint{\int\!\!\!\int}
Here \! which is a negative thin space equals -1/6 \quad with \quad being 1em.
Thus, I want to define a \iint like this (inspired by your macro) :
<assign|iint|<int><space|-0.5emunit>>
What surprised me is that it is as same as \int\int. I don't know why :(
Tim
From: address@hidden
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 12:01:56 +0100
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign
Actually this is not what I used to do.
I used to define :
<\assign | iint | <\int><\space | -3mm>>
<\assign | iiint | <\int><\space | -3mm><\int><\space | -3mm>>
For a double integral I would type : \iint \int and for a triple \iiint \int
This combination to have the domain subscript at the right place. And this is probably the worst way to do it...
Julien
Le 22 févr. 2014 à 11:39, LiTim <address@hidden> a écrit :
Hi everyone,
it seems that TeXmacs doesn't support amsmath, so I cannot use \iint \iiint for double integral and triple integral. How do you input the multiple integral sign? Could you tell me that?
Best regards,
Tim
- [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, LiTim, 02/22/2014
- Re: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Julien Frontisi, 02/22/2014
- Re: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Julien Frontisi, 02/22/2014
- RE: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Tim Li, 02/22/2014
- Re: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Julien Frontisi, 02/23/2014
- RE: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Tim Li, 02/23/2014
- [TeXmacs] maxima ps_out like ?, HG, 02/23/2014
- RE: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Tim Li, 02/23/2014
- Re: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Julien Frontisi, 02/23/2014
- RE: [TeXmacs] Multiple integral sign, Tim Li, 02/22/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.