Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: [TeXmacs] TeXmacs 1.99.6

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] TeXmacs 1.99.6


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Andrey G. Grozin" <address@hidden>
  • To: TeXmacs <address@hidden>
  • Cc: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] TeXmacs 1.99.6
  • Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:40:38 +0700 (+07)

Is it Qt4-only? Qt4 is being removed from most Linux distros (including Gentoo where I maintain the TeXmacs package), only Qt5 will remain soon.

Whats the status of porting to guile >= 2.0? guile-1.8 is being removed too.

When I compile it, I get

x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-clang++ -ISystem -ISystem/Boot -ISystem/Classes -ISystem/Files -ISystem/Link -ISystem/Misc -ISystem/Language -IKer
nel/Abstractions -IKernel/Containers -IKernel/Types -IData/Convert -IData/Drd -IData/History -IData/Observers -IData/Document -IData/S
tring -IData/Tmfs -IData/Tree -IScheme -IGraphics/Bitmap_fonts -IGraphics/Fonts -IGraphics/Gui -IGraphics/Mathematics -IGraphics/Rende
rer -IGraphics/Handwriting -IGraphics/Types -IGraphics/Pictures -IGraphics/Spacial -IGraphics/Colors -IPlugins -I/var/tmp/portage/app-
office/texmacs-1.99.6/work/TeXmacs-1.99.6-src/TeXmacs/include -pipe -O2 -Wall -W -include config.h -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_COR
E_LIB -DQT_SHARED -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I. -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4 -D_REEN
TRANT -DQTTEXMACS -Wall -Wno-return-type -O2 -march=native -pipe -fno-rtti -O2 -march=native -pipe -stdlib=libstdc++ -fno-rtti -c ./Sy
stem/Misc/data_cache.cpp -o Objects/data_cache.o
In file included from ./Graphics/Types/curve.cpp:16:
Graphics/Types/math_util.hpp:27:15: error: declaration conflicts with target of using declaration already in scope
inline double pow (double x, int n) {
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.4.0/include/g++-v6/cmath:422:3: note: target of using declaration
pow(double __x, int __i)
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.4.0/include/g++-v6/math.h:55:12: note: using declaration
using std::pow;
^

I'm sure there should be some trivial fix.

Andrey Grozin



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page