mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[TeXmacs <address@hidden>]

Dear Max, Giovanni,

I think that at least part of this discussion can be moved to texmacs-dev.

The Blog/Wiki could host both more technical developer material and
useful documentation for general users.  But it would be good to
think of a structure and headers that allow everybody to efficiently
find what one wants.  For instance, "awesome TeXmacs" is flattering,
but not very informative.

For general users, maybe a collection of sample documents,
sample presentations, and sample style files could be useful.
I think that it is a pity that we did not receive many
contributed style files.  CSS styles for webpages would
also be welcome.

For developers, let us move the discussion to texmacs-dev.

Best wishes, --Joris

P.S.: concerning reviewing the contents, since Max volunteers,
let us see where things go in the next couple of weeks.
I have no strong preference in either way.



On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 04:47:46PM +0100, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 11. Nov 2020, at 16:37, Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 11.11.20 15:35, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
> >> 
> >>> On 11. Nov 2020, at 14:32, Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> I'm eager to see extensions developed by users. The appropriate way to 
> >> host them seems to have external git repositories and to have in the 
> >> blog an article about the usage of the extension or about its 
> >> developement, etc...
> >> 
> > Then I suggest (I can do it with a pull request too, but maybe it is 
> > better if you do it, since you are going to be the one that filters the 
> > blog's content) to add a note on this in the guidelines, maybe next to or 
> > at the bullet point "Articles on adding new features or customizations."; 
> > maybe with the annotation "these articles, collected in a section of the 
> > 'Awesome GNU TeXmacs' document, will provide a small database of user 
> > contributions" .
> > 
> 
> I will. I was already pondering that the current "awesome" article is too 
> disperse, somehow it should be a showcase for the possibilities of TeXMacs. 
> Other stuff like recipes and extensions should be collected elsewhere.
> 
> M.
> 
> 
> 
> > G.
> > 
>