- From: François-Xavier Thomas <address@hidden>
- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs
- Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:25:59 +0100
- Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of address@hidden designates 10.101.6.23 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=address@hidden; dkim=pass header.i=address@hidden
Just thought of something else : it would be really cool to have the
ability to add words to the aspell dictionary!
Have a nice day!
On 3/2/12, Henri Girard <address@hidden> wrote:
>
Why change the name ? It's one of the only soft we get at first research
>
: put texmacs in google and you get it !
>
For example : maxima sage axiom are damned name :)
>
In google you never get the right soft with those names !
>
How stressing it can be for example to look for RLC maxima axiom ....
>
They bring you anything but right search !
>
tex is fine in texmacs so we know what is about !
>
I am not an expert in texmacs that why I like it, to write maths physics
>
it comes near "naturally" and that 's what i expect from a wisiwig other
>
wise I would choose another none wisiwig latex things !
>
I am translating and making some articles with texmacs (translation too)
>
though I believe most people using texmacs speak english ?
>
well thanks again to all those who are making such an excellent soft :)
>
I use it on linux.
>
regards
>
Henri
>
>
Le 02/03/2012 00:41, Peter Rapčan a écrit :
>
> Supplemental: If you really want to change texmacs' name (to get rid of
>
> the tex connotation), I vote for TeXmacs -> TechMax.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter.
>
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2012, at 8:30 PM, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
>
>
>
>> Dear TeXmacs users,
>
>>
>
>> Tomorrow is the final day of the TeXmacs workshop.
>
>>
>
>> A few important issues will be discussed in a dedicated session. Joris
>
>> has put forward a questionnaire to guide the discussion. To sample the
>
>> wishes, interests and ideas of TeXmacs users we would welcome the
>
>> opinion of all of you who could not make it to Faro.
>
>>
>
>> Here are the questions*:
>
>>
>
>> ! What would you like to happen with TeXmacs?
>
>> * three most important point
>
>> * then summarize in just one
>
>>
>
>> ! What are the most important bugs?
>
>> * three bugs
>
>> * one bug
>
>>
>
>> ! What would be best for TeXmacs to become adopted?
>
>> * three points
>
>> * one point
>
>>
>
>> ! How to organize TeXmacs as a community
>
>> * three points
>
>> * one point
>
>>
>
>> ! What kind of documentation would you like to see more?
>
>> * three points
>
>> * one point
>
>>
>
>> ! How should TeXmacs be publicized
>
>> * Name change (or not): three suggestions and one suggestion
>
>> * New website, new general graphical design (logo?).
>
>>
>
>> ! What do you think you could contribute?
>
>> * three points
>
>> * one point
>
>>
>
>> Cheers,
>
>>
>
>> Álvaro Tejero Cantero.
>
>>
>
>> * whoever is interested in looking at the names that have been
>
>> proposed already please make yourself a user in http://tiddlyspace.com
>
>> and send to me privately the id so that I can authorize you to see the
>
>> private pages in http://tamiz.tiddlyspace.com. You can suggest new
>
>> names; in that case using the letters 't' and 'm' is of interest to
>
>> ease the transition process.
>
>
--
*François-Xavier Thomas*
Élève ingénieur à Télécom ParisTech
- [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Alvaro Tejero Cantero, 03/01/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, David G. Wonnacott, 03/01/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, François-Xavier Thomas, 03/01/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Peter Rapčan, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Pablo S . Casas, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Peter Rapčan, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Peter Rapčan, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Jan Lellmann, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Sam Liddicott, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, Lukasz Stafiniak, 03/02/2012
- Re: [TeXmacs] Input welcome for discussion on the future of TeXmacs, François Poulain, 03/02/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.