Hi Joris,

Apology for the confusion. I meant the latter: “citation of a bibliographic entry”.

Yes, I would agree. Citation of a bibliographic is not ideal for audience. Inserting them in footnote of each referenced slide would be better, but I don’t know how to accomplish that in TeXmacs. Maybe we need a style for it? I have tried that direction, but I failed… I don’t have enough experience for that :(

But for now when I using images and other materials from others’ work in my slides, I would need to put reference (to some paper, and I would like to take advantage of BibTex) beside it. However, the standard exporting process does not produce the expected result, as shown in screenshots, hence the “help me" email.

Hope this clarifies my intention.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Joy


> On 26 Mar 2020, at 8:36 AM, TeXmacs <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Joy,
>
> I am not sure to understand what you did here.
> You mean "reference to an equation" or "citation of a bibliographic entry" here?
>
> I am not sure whether it is a good practice to use bibliographic citations
> inside beamer presentations, since people cannot loop up citations during
> a presentation.  Please clarify what you wish to do.
>
> Best wishes, --Joris
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 02:02:57PM +0000, Joy Yang wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been struggling with an issue when creating slides with TeXmacs Beamer mode. The issue is that reference number would not be generated correctly, instead of a number in bracket, it is a question mark in bracket. My TeXmacs version is 1.99.12. An example output would look like this:
>> [cid:477382E7-F003-4980-9B46-F651FAE5A22E]
>> Currently, I hack a little bit on the original Scheme code to first give me a buffer of the flatten-out slides in a single slide, then I export that buffer, which gives me the expected output.
>> [cid:E85300EE-E6B1-4E54-B1B0-FDB8D796D0E7]
>> But I think this should be corrected.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Joy
>
>
>