texmacs-users - Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm

From: "Andrey G. Grozin" <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 12:36:01 +0600

Hi *,

> > However, I agree with Jay that the 'd' after the integrand should be in
> > roman
> > font. I do not know what is typographically correct, that is just my two
> > cents.
> This opinion can indeed be defended, but it is not the current
> typographical tradition.
Some publishers (e.g., Springer-Verlag) require exactly this: d in
integrals and derivatives, i (the imaginary unit), e (exp(1)) *must* be in
roman.

Andrey

\int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Daniel Duparc, 03/01/2002
- Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Jay Belanger, 03/01/2002
  - Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/01/2002
    - Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, David Allouche, 03/01/2002
      - Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/01/2002
        
        Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Andrey G. Grozin, 03/02/2002
        
        Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/02/2002
        
        Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Andrey G. Grozin, 03/02/2002
        
        Convention for products and operators--, Álvaro Tejero Cantero, 03/02/2002
        Re: Convention for products and operators--, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/02/2002
        
        Wiki, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/02/2002
    - Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Michael John Downes, 03/04/2002
      - Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm, Joris van der Hoeven, 03/04/2002

List archive

Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm