Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Andrey G. Grozin" <address@hidden>
  • To: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: \int_a^b f(x) dx : dx is in rm
  • Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 17:25:06 +0600

> > Some publishers (e.g., Springer-Verlag) require exactly this: d in
> > integrals and derivatives, i (the imaginary unit), e (exp(1)) *must* be in
> > roman.
> I know, especially for i and e (maybe I should create macros \i, \e and \d);
> this happened to me for one paper (published by Elsevier).
> However, a few weeks ago, a friend of mine made the same remark and
> I have looked at a few dozen of books from different publishers in
> my personal library; none of them used this convention.
I'm now writing a book for Springer-Verlag. They absolutely insist on this
convention. Their LaTeX style contains macros \D, \I, \E for this.

Andrey





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page