Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : Valery Pipin <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Cc: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 14:35:59 +0800
- Organization: ISTP
I'm sorry for stupid question.
The problem solved via compiling texmacs.lisp under maxima and the
corresponding change of tm_maxima.
I also suggest that we have to do this via some automatic way for others lisp
implementation.
On Friday 05 December 2003 13:54, Valery Pipin wrote:
>Hello!
>
>I found that usual work in Texmacs (1.0.2.9) with maxima gcl compiled binary
>is very uncomfortable sometimes. The texmacs reaction is very slow often.
>It is not the case of sbcl maxima's compiled binary. I was very wondered of
>the texmacs speed in this case.
>Is it because that sbcl compile texmacs.lisp before starting the session?
>How to do so for gcl?
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Valery
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Maxima mailing list
>address@hidden
>http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
- texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Valery Pipin, 12/05/2003
- Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Valery Pipin, 12/05/2003
- Re: [TeXmacs] Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, David Allouche, 12/05/2003
- Re: [TeXmacs] Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Valery Pipin, 12/05/2003
- Re: [TeXmacs] Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Valery Pipin, 12/10/2003
- Re: [TeXmacs] Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 12/10/2003
- Re: [TeXmacs] Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Valery Pipin, 12/10/2003
- Re: [TeXmacs] Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 12/10/2003
- Re: [TeXmacs] Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, David Allouche, 12/05/2003
- Re: [Maxima] texmacs & maxima-gcl vs maxima-sbcl, Valery Pipin, 12/05/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.