Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: [TeXmacs] New TeXmacs package available for Slackware 10

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] New TeXmacs package available for Slackware 10


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
  • To: am29 <address@hidden>
  • Cc: TeXmacs Users Mailing list <address@hidden>
  • Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] New TeXmacs package available for Slackware 10
  • Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 11:30:21 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, am29 wrote:
> Hi, I've recently submitted a texmacs .tgz package to
> www.linuxpackages.net and it has been accepted yesterday.

Good initiative; thank you.

> I've compiled texmacs for i686 on slackware 10 using the default
> optimization value but now I'm planning to change CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS to
> obtain packages compatible whit i486. Usually slack packages are
> compiled with
> -O2 -march=i486 -mcpu=i686
> and I'd like to know if other optimization are suggested/needed. I used
>
> ./configure
>
> and I've found
>
> enabling optimizations, -O3 -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-default-inline
> -fno-inline
>
> Should I keep those value?

Yes. Due to a bug in early versions of g++ 3.*, we had to include
the flags -fno-default-inline -fno-inline. In the most recent versions,
these options can be suppressed in order to achieve a considerable gain
in speed. But this situation is recognized by the configure script.
What version of g++ do you use?

Best wishes, Joris




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page