mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

["Papa , ou était tu le jour où ils ont supprimé la liberté d'expression sur Internet ? " <address@hidden>]

I confirm it s postscript file  generated and not pdf

gnu@robby:/media/51E7-3815/$ file work.2010.0.3.pdf
work.2010.0.3.pdf: PostScript document text conforming DSC level 2.0


On 28/12/2010, Adrian S. <address@hidden> wrote:
> The version in www.texmacs.org is 1.0.7.9 and works fine.
> -Adrian.
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Pedro Sanchez <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Adrian S. <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>>> You can use a more recent version of TeXmacs (1.0.7.9 works fine), as
>>> Joris said,  or you can do:
>>>
>>> 1)Export to ps   (or to pdf, since the file that it will produce is
>>> really a .ps file)
>>> 2)Run the command in a terminal
>>> ps2pdf name-of-file.ps
>>>
>>
>> I confirm the bug on 1.0.7.7 (latest version available on archlinux),
>> and  back in november after a couple of days I found your hackfix
>>
>> I don't bother reporting anyway, as the reply is always "wait for a
>> future version"
>>
>