- From: "Papa , ou était tu le jour où ils ont supprimé la liberté d'expression sur Internet ? " <address@hidden>
- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Pdf export big problem
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:02:50 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y/c+dWmHKQrNFlkLywOKdFlRdVzbQaimDs0/Q90pZAva4Auqu1N6Y0iWEF3SxODUKM GObIQyFyboOSkFoQ8JDP4FidCVQQPOhKY8XXCLutji8NJNm+HU2U1CVer2/qWNyyXXUu LvRonKGkEP+Ce3uHkuIFUZG2i8tKtZoItDfRo=
I confirm it s postscript file generated and not pdf
gnu@robby:/media/51E7-3815/$ file work.2010.0.3.pdf
work.2010.0.3.pdf: PostScript document text conforming DSC level 2.0
On 28/12/2010, Adrian S. <address@hidden> wrote:
>
The version in www.texmacs.org is 1.0.7.9 and works fine.
>
-Adrian.
>
>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Pedro Sanchez <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Adrian S. <address@hidden>
>
> wrote:
>
>> You can use a more recent version of TeXmacs (1.0.7.9 works fine), as
>
>> Joris said, or you can do:
>
>>
>
>> 1)Export to ps (or to pdf, since the file that it will produce is
>
>> really a .ps file)
>
>> 2)Run the command in a terminal
>
>> ps2pdf name-of-file.ps
>
>>
>
>
>
> I confirm the bug on 1.0.7.7 (latest version available on archlinux),
>
> and back in november after a couple of days I found your hackfix
>
>
>
> I don't bother reporting anyway, as the reply is always "wait for a
>
> future version"
>
>
>
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.