Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : "Sam Liddicott" <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] No backtick in mode=prog anymore
- Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:23:02 -0000
- Envelope-to:
- Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAMAAABg3Am1AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADxQTFRF NTdQY2Z/i286eHFugnNXoJBwm5GCs5VeoqO0ua+fwLCQ4c2q19C81NDF4eLr/unQ/PTf/fXW+/rq /f/7XKo76wAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAi9JREFUSMetloGSqyAMRVsFNAQkxP//15cE 62rFdt/MZqbTVu/hBhLEx/qf8fgDIAN455wHyPk7wCIe9nA+fwGSH87hgD8AHPfRpy2GwdMtcBh+ mg4Ech9Ih+RNixJKDLEL0GF8VLkSojePHrDlryNijbFW8zBg8PUKbBOI6D1WCV5Rf2DzxCtgBlMs tRRVW5LyVW3ew1TfAZZ6RcQicpb4yZmaC74DJADK6BdATOrUAbJzsZie+K22ZnEBknNYysvhVH6u 1X8CqAe4DuANoPoOrAbsHXUARJ5knc5z4EyyTnHoAqj7xvkYIdk65AwhyEZKMusOIDV2QQQaCnDQ gBiDR3RdIEb5CBESt2wgQJI0Yx/Agphg1MgNsD+QkszM9wHVPx/PeQOW+fmcR9DF8+4CyCJhCuP8 fDzmBbLqs8JzMODqYNfDvKhoGYM2lDosy5jlRozccRAgrPM8iygQS3Mv87IugUgKlC7NZ6liuy4r uresVq5QuQAr09ZKEga8OkluyKXeQ6Bs3SrtqgC1pWLNqAfwDhBnB+sK8OrVL4D4h1B4zWPWhJhu gPUHKA5EwSMYUMsdQK+UKDhIOTSHeg+8HCoTOGtB/gwcl4mSdGybwXegPWhM/RHYKwchkckhUNMX 6j7ueQNScLbZZOPRxaADyO2UQCJpl7wbnE6gQ+ksWjpngxOwF1tF5ecP3R6KB+AQxPfHLncQ+nKw 06fhu68OTIfJ869eTtg22l+9zfwDK3mKl5BFHMYAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
Joris, do you have any comments about this backtick weirdness?
I think back ticks should have fixed width when mode=prog.
I'm curious about the reasoning behind backticks being exported in text as unicode 0xE28098 which looks quite different.
I'm curious how that when a text file with a back-tick is imported a different symbol is show on the screen (looks like a normal back-tick, i.e. a grave accent instead of a back-quote).
Perhaps when the back-tick key is pressed when mode=prog it should generate the character represented as \0 (what a weird representation?); and when mode=prog this character should be exported as ascii 0x60 instead of unicode 0xE28098
If this sounds reasonable to you I will try to contrive it and send a patch, although I fear that interpreting a keystroke differently when mode=prog will be simpler than cut-n-paste differently into a place where mode=prog - perhaps you could advise?
Sam
On 20/09/10 16:33, Sam Liddicott wrote:
Another problem;
in mode=prog, backticks are not fixed-width like other characters. Type multiple ` backticks and watch the caret move further and further away from the rhs of the text.
Sam
On 16/09/10 15:38, Sam Liddicott wrote:
When in mode=prog, the back-tick (or back-quote) key used to generate this character:
`
but with todays SVN head update something screwy is going in.
The back-tick key generates a left-single quote which is saved as a back-tick in the .tm file but when exported as text (with texmacs -s -c file.tm file.txt -q) comes out as ‘ or unicode E28098
If I cut-n-paste existing back-ticks in the document, they come out as \0 (slash zero) in the .tm file when it is saved but come out properly as a back-tick when exported to text.
So I think my complaint is the back-tick key has started generating single-left-quote in mode=prog
For now I have to cut-n-paste existing back-ticks.
Sam
--
[FSF Associate Member #2325] <http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=2325>
--
[FSF Associate Member #2325] <http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=2325>
--
[FSF Associate Member #2325] <http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=2325>
<http://www.openrightsgroup.org/>
- Re: [TeXmacs] No backtick in mode=prog anymore, Sam Liddicott, 01/07/2011
- Re: [TeXmacs] No backtick in mode=prog anymore, Joris van der Hoeven, 01/07/2011
- Re: [TeXmacs] No backtick in mode=prog anymore, Sam Liddicott, 01/07/2011
- Re: [TeXmacs] No backtick in mode=prog anymore, Joris van der Hoeven, 01/07/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.