Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: [TeXmacs] Using the Qt port

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] Using the Qt port


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Gubinelli Massimiliano <address@hidden>
  • To: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] Using the Qt port
  • Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:41:39 +0100

Hi,
could you describe with more details in which sense it is slower? Also I do
not understand well the difficulty in producing PDF, the Qt version uses the
same code the X11 version uses and there should be no real differences in the
way they handle PDF conversion. Could you provide me (even privately) a test
file where to investigate the problem?

Thanks for the feedback.

max




On Mar 7, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Lukasz Stafiniak <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks! Now basic shortcuts like "M-t N t" work. I've recompiled from
>> updated svn, I'll give it a try.
>
> Some issues:
> * images appear of bigger size (not a problem, and someone already
> mentioned it)
> * no "texts directory" icon when loading a file -- actually, there
> should be "TeXmacs resources" or something, going to .TeXmacs/ which
> is hard to get to since invisible
> ** hidden directory contents are also not provided by completion, I'll
> move my style files to TEXMACS_PATH altogether
> * shortcuts with shift modifier as discussed in another thread
> * it is considerably slower
> * when generating the pdf of a beamer presentation with drawings, it
> hogs memory, works for at least tens of minutes, and generates an 80
> megabytes file (pdf viewer recognizes the number of pages in it but
> hangs on displaying the pages), while the X11 version works in
> reasonable time and generates a good 140 kilobytes file
>
> The last issue and the speed makes me go back to the X11 version.
>
> Best.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page