mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[François-Xavier Thomas <address@hidden>]

Hi Lukasz,

Which platform do you use, Windows, Linux or Mac?
As far as I'm concerned, I'm using a compiled-by-hand TeXmacs 1.0.7.14 on 
OSX, and it works okay.

François-Xavier Thomas

On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:41 PM, Gubinelli Massimiliano wrote:

> Hi,
> could you describe with more details in which sense it is slower? Also I do 
> not understand well the difficulty in producing PDF, the Qt version uses 
> the same code the X11 version uses and there should be no real differences 
> in the way they handle PDF conversion. Could you provide me (even 
> privately) a test file where to investigate the problem?
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> max
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 7, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Lukasz Stafiniak <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks! Now basic shortcuts like "M-t N t" work. I've recompiled from
>>> updated svn, I'll give it a try.
>> 
>> Some issues:
>> * images appear of bigger size (not a problem, and someone already 
>> mentioned it)
>> * no "texts directory" icon when loading a file -- actually, there
>> should be "TeXmacs resources" or something, going to .TeXmacs/ which
>> is hard to get to since invisible
>> ** hidden directory contents are also not provided by completion, I'll
>> move my style files to TEXMACS_PATH altogether
>> * shortcuts with shift modifier as discussed in another thread
>> * it is considerably slower
>> * when generating the pdf of a beamer presentation with drawings, it
>> hogs memory, works for at least tens of minutes, and generates an 80
>> megabytes file (pdf viewer recognizes the number of pages in it but
>> hangs on displaying the pages), while the X11 version works in
>> reasonable time and generates a good 140 kilobytes file
>> 
>> The last issue and the speed makes me go back to the X11 version.
>> 
>> Best.
>