Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: [TeXmacs] bold tt

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] bold tt


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Sam Liddicott <address@hidden>
  • To: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] bold tt
  • Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:30:40 +0000



On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Aleksandr Dobkin <address@hidden> wrote:
The problem here is that a bold variant of the typewriter font doesn't exist in the original Computer Modern family. The observed behavior is that bold typewriter and non-bold typewriter look the same. This is actually the default behavior in latex as well.

Yeah - the latex users rebelled and many methods of bold tt followed, included ams's poor-mans bold, txfonts or luximono.

Sam



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page