mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[François-Xavier Thomas <address@hidden>]

Just started my own TeXmacs. I had to manually remove a few of OSX's useless 
system shortcuts, but after that Ctrl+arrows (it's the Ctrl key, not Alt, by 
the way, at least on my own system) worked well for inserting cells in a 
table.

Are you sure there's no Windows-specific shortcut blocking the way?

On Oct 10, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Jizhe Zhang wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Sorry to interrupt about the cookbook discussion, but back to my
> original problem, especially the problem 1, the malfunction of
> alt+right in table environment, could anybody help me, please?
> 
> Best
> Jizhe
> 
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:57 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Dear all,
>> 
>> I just started to use TeXmacs. It's indeed a good tool especially to write
>> small documents. But I encounter a bunch of problems described in the
>> following. BTW, I am using windows 7.
>> 
>> 1 The document says that alt+right can generate a new column in the table
>> environment. I tried, but the only thing happens is that on the left footer
>> there is a line saying "keyboard shortcut: alt+right", other than that 
>> nothing
>> happens. Is there anything I missed?
>> 
>> 2 Obviously lots of commands are compatible with LaTeX, for example \[ is
>> equivalent to A+$. This gives me lots of convenience. But where can I find 
>> a
>> list about what commands are compatible? The \[ thing doesn't appear in the
>> manual at all.
>> 
>> 3 How to insert the title with command? Especially where can I find a
>> comprehensive document about commands? In the manual it's mostly keyboard
>> shortcuts, but I prefer these commands personally. They are easy to 
>> remember
>> and similar to LaTex.
>> 
>> I think these are the most urgent problems I have when using TeXmacs.
>> 
>> As a novice I also have some thoughts about TeXmacs. No doubt that it's a 
>> great
>> word processor. I fell in love with it immediately after ten minutes of 
>> trial.
>> However, I cannot find a very good document about this great tool. The only
>> user document is only less than 100 pages long and lots of important 
>> things are
>> too concise. Comparing to LaTeX, an entry level tutorial is about that 
>> length.
>> I believe that it's one of the greatest obstacle when making this fantastic
>> tool more popular. A novice like me will soon get very frustrated when he 
>> finds
>> that lots of questions remain unsolved even in the so called user manual. 
>> Also
>> the helping documents are spread everywhere and not consistent. The 
>> downloaded
>> document is even not the same as the document on the website. Lots of 
>> links on
>> the website are lost.
>> 
>> Well, thanks in advance for all your help. I do hope that such a powerful 
>> word
>> processor will become more and more popular in the future. I think that's 
>> why I
>> cannot help coming up with these boring comments.
>> 
>> Best
>> JZ