Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: [TeXmacs] More on TeXmacs Footnote behaviour

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: [TeXmacs] More on TeXmacs Footnote behaviour


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Sam Liddicott <address@hidden>
  • To: François Poulain <address@hidden>
  • Cc: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] More on TeXmacs Footnote behaviour
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:25:30 +0000

The recursion was invoked inside the continuation and I did add render-footnote to the continuation then so it should have recursed into the original definition.

Sam

On Jan 21, 2013 7:22 AM, "François Poulain" <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Sam,

Le Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:43:44 +0000,
Sam Liddicott <address@hidden> a écrit :

> Interestingly I had to re-define render-footnote using quasi; adding
> it to the with-default-style closure and defining it like this caused
> a crash (I guess infinite recursion)
> <assign|render-footnote|<macro|nr|body|<with-default-style|<render-footnote|<arg|nr>|<arg|body>>>>>
> I tried deferring evaluation if the inner render-footnote so it would
> take the enclosed value by means of compound, and quote, but it
> always crashed.

I don't understand what do you expect from this code if not a
recursion trap. :)

It's like (define (f x y) (f x y)).

Anyway, we should avoid TeXmacs crash, e.g. using a max recursion depth
counter.

François

--
François Poulain <address@hidden>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page