mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Massimiliano Gubinelli <address@hidden>]

Dear Patrick

 I use very often conversion to LaTeX from TeXmacs and what your colleagues 
claim does not seems true to me. 

The LaTeX code which TeXmacs generates is perfectly normal and with very few 
macros and usually compile fines even if you still have to check. There could 
be of course problems and in case you find some bug/problem it is important 
that you report it in the texmacs-dev mailing list (or here) so that we can 
try to fix it.

Since TeXmacs is not based on LaTeX the conversion process is nontrivial but 
usually if you do not do crazy stuff in your TeXmacs document everything 
should work fine. Again, it could happen that the file does not compile but 
it is usually easy to fix.

Anyway here or in the forum you can ask for help in case something is not 
working.


Best regards,
Massimiliano Gubinelli


> On 6. Apr 2021, at 11:28, patrick Teller <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> dear colleagues
> 
> I do not know TeX (I was lazzy) and I write courses and problems using 
> TeXmacs.
> 
> I will  have to submit a paper in LateX and colleagues tell me that 
> TeXmacs's LateX is bad and has compiling problems.
> 
> Do you think  I may submit the paper written with TeXmacs and saved in 
> LateX through TeXmacs ?
> 
> thank you for your help
> 
> Patrick Teller
> 
> Le 05/03/2021 à 22:17, TeXmacs a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I am happy to announce the release of TeXmacs 1.99.19.
>> 
>> The new release consists mainly of a large number of bug fixes,
>> including many fixes for sporadic segfaults during LaTeX imports.
>> 
>> The new release also comes with a further enhanced structured
>> search and replace facility.  You may now use wildcards both
>> during structured search _and_ structured search and replace.
>> (Example: swap the numerator and denominator of a fraction;
>> wildcards are inserted using C-1, C-2, ...)
>> You may also modify some preferences for search & replace.
>> 
>> Best wishes, --Joris