mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Frank <address@hidden>]

Hello, all

I would like to point out another fact that TeXmacs supports "TeXmacs Scheme" 
output which is similar to Scheme programming language, so I don't think that it is 
quite inaccessible, especially for Lisp programmers. The current formatting is bad but 
I guess that it is not quite difficult to improve, as it could be passed to the pretty 
printing:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Pretty-Printing.html

I attach a sample.

Best,
Frank

On 7/12/21, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> Beyond the technical, there are other considerations.  Whilst it could be 
> well structured according to some software engineering metric.
> But its syntactic format is not more accessible to code modification than tex 
> or latex, or to any other programming language.  I might
> understand the production of an internal format that fits in with a more 
> structured format for what you want to do.  But in doing so, you
> have removed an important aspect.  Whilst it could be acceptable with schools 
> and colleges, I do not see how to avoid the observation
> I have made.

Attachment: test.stm
Description: audio/stm