mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[TeXmacs <address@hidden>]

Hi Frank,

The binding force of ':' is larger than the binding force of ','
in your example, whence the "incorrectness".

You may put a pair of invisible brackets around "f,g" using '( tab'.
After that, your formula should be "correct".

Best wishes, --Joris


On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:14:17AM +0000, Frank wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> A question related: I don't know how to write correctly f,g: [a,b]→𝐑 
> semantically correctly. I enabled semantic editing, and something like this 
> is always labeled red.
> 
> Best,
> Frank
> 
> 于 2021年8月11日 UTC 上午8:10:39, Massimiliano Gubinelli <address@hidden> 写到:
> >What about "g" ":" "[tab]" ? This add the colon with a bit more space. 
> >
> >Max
> >
> >
> >> On 11. Aug 2021, at 06:01, Pierre-Henri Jondot <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Hi everyone,
> >> 
> >> Still having fun writing mathematics with TeXmacs.
> >> 
> >> There is a little something that is a minor annoyance to me : I usually 
> >> write a lot thing like : 
> >> Soient f : [a,b] -> R et g : [a,b] -> R deux fonctions.
> >> 
> >> By default, TeXmacs puts almost no space (at least not enough for me) 
> >> between f, g and the  : char.
> >> 
> >> To add a little space there (that is ok for f but is not quite enough 
> >> for g), I have to do : f, :, left arrow, space, right arrow...
> >> 
> >> If my typography habits are wrong (for French course material to be 
> >> precise) please correct me. Otherwise, is there a way to force TeXmacs 
> >> to automatically put a bit more space before the : char ? (The document 
> >> I am writing is of course declared to be in French)
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >> Pierre-Henri
> >
> 
> -- 
> 使用 K-9 Mail 发送自我的Android设备。