Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Hello (again),

I have now a question regarding the invisible symbols (§3.9 of the manual), a
great feature that is clearly missing in LaTeX.

I understand that the `function application` symbol allows to disambiguate
products in situations like `sin x`, where there are traditionnally no
brackets
around the argument. How about more standard situations, like `f(x)`? Should I
place a `function application` symbol between `f` and `(`? Semantically, it
*is*
a function application. However, from the perspective of inter-operation with
a
programming language, I guess the symbol is not necessary, as `f(x)` would
correctly be interpreted. From the perspective of (beautiful) type-setting,
this
might be different.

Same question then goes to something like `D²f(x)(δx, δy)` (second
differential
of `f` at `x`, evaluated for the increments `δx` and `δy`).

Thanks!

Sébastien

---

Sébastien Brisard


Laboratoire Navier (UMR 8205)
École des Ponts, Université Gustave Eiffel, CNRS
F-77455 Marne-la-Vallée
+33(0)1 64 15 37 51
[ https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/sbrisard |
https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/sbrisard ]
[ https://sbrisard.github.io/ | https://sbrisard.github.io ]

---

• Aligned equations, Sébastien Brisard, 12/20/2021
  • Invisible symbols, Sébastien Brisard, 12/20/2021
    • Re: Invisible symbols, Basile Audoly, 12/20/2021
  • Re: Aligned equations, Basile Audoly, 12/20/2021
    • Re: Aligned equations, Andrey G. Grozin, 12/20/2021
      • Re: Aligned equations, TeXmacs, 12/21/2021
    • Re: Aligned equations, Mirko Vukovic, 12/24/2021

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.