Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: Annotated equations

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: Annotated equations


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Massimiliano Gubinelli <address@hidden>
  • To: Alvaro Cantero <address@hidden>
  • Cc: TeXmacs users <address@hidden>
  • Subject: Re: Annotated equations
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 12:45:30 +0100

Hi Alvaro,

  It is nice indeed, especially in education. One can already do overlays ("Ink here"), but at the moment we cannot move things relatively to typesetted text like they do. I use sometimes in my notes.
The overlay is itself a tag, so move around with the text and one could maybe simulate something like what you see there.

My problem with overlays in TeXmacs is that it is a bit tricky to move in and out, maybe the UI can be improved but I do not have concrete suggestions.

Max




On 12. Jan 2022, at 11:57, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden> wrote:

Hi,

Annotating equations with situated comments makes text less burdensome, equations more self-contained and, at least in an education context, the content more engaging, in my opinion. Somebody published a proof of concept with tikz + latex (code forthcoming...),


TeXmacs already makes it much more efficient to add under/overbraces (that are actually readable as you type, unlike in LaTeX); I wonder if everything needed to support this kind of annotations (with colored boxes) is available at the Scheme level or would there be a need for C++ changes?

Best,

Álvaro.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page