mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Nefton Pali <address@hidden>]

Dear Giovanni,

many thanks for your kind reply and hellp. Yes, please find enclosed the .bib file that I created. It is impossible to integrate it when I select on the menu File-->Import-->BibTex

Best,

Nefton

Le 07/10/2023 à 10:11, Giovanni Piredda a écrit :

On 06/10/23 13:47, Nefton Pali wrote:

Dear all,

please could you send me clear instructions how to create a file bibliography and how to integrate the bibliography. I tryed to apply the manual quite unsuccesfully.

Hi Nefton,

it would be much easier if you would write step by step what you did, maybe there are ambiguities in the manual that I did not detect and if you write what you did it makes it possible to spot what needs to be changed.

More over I'm not able to count the formulas relatively to each section. For instance I want a numeration like (9.13) instead of (350).

That, on the opposite, I can tell you now: once that the cursor is in a display formula, you can right-click, and in the menu that opens select Preferences -> Prefix by section number; you can access the same menu, again when the cursor is in a display formula: on the lower part of the menu bar you will see the symbol of a wrench key and you need to press that.

Pls. ask if you need more information.

Giovanni

Please hellp me.

Nefton

Le 06/10/2023 à 12:21, Julien Frontisi a écrit :

        By
          nested trees, I just meant trees inside trees. That is already
          implemented in trees.

To make them horizontal, maybe a macro like <\rotate | 90 | <\tree | <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> | … |  <\rotate | -90 | <arg>> >

If you do it manually it works (clumsily) but it is not easy to access the elements of the tree after building it.

Julien

Le 6 oct. 2023 à 10:42, vincent douce <address@hidden> a écrit :

yes, \tree corresponds to [mathmode]insert->tree and works very fine for « vertical » trees

but 99% of probabitliy papers (at least in high schools) and 99% of screenshot on google image with keywords « probabillity trees »  have horizontal trees, not vertical one

i have no idea if it would be difficult for the developer team to implement it ; or maybe it is in project

also, Julien, you say « nested trees » 

do you mind nested trees exist in TeXmacs or do you suggest they would be welcome ?

Vincent

Le 6 oct. 2023 à 09:01, Julien Frontisi <address@hidden> a écrit :

In mode math, \tree works fine. Nested trees if you need more than a root and one generation of children.

One would need some kind of matrix transposition to make it horizontal.

Julien

Le 6 oct. 2023 à 04:41, Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> a écrit :

How do you construct the vertical tree in TeXmacs? With the current TeXmacs, I would construct either tree with a drawing.

On 06/10/23 01:18, vincent douce wrote:

hello Giovanni

from TeXmacs (vertical) : <GraphiqueCollé-1.png>

preferred (horizontal) : <GraphiqueCollé-2.png>

when you type "tree probability » on internet you only get horizontal trees…

Vincent

Le 5 oct. 2023 à 19:13, Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> a écrit :

Attachment: TotalRealEmbed7.bib
Description: application/unknown-content-type