- From: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] folds
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:40:38 +0100
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 05:48:26PM +0100, Michael Lachmann wrote:
>
I just started using folds, trying to make my documents more managable.
>
For now, I like "grouped", because it easily lets me see where a fold
>
starts and ends. I guess regular folds with varsession do that, too.
All plug-in folds come with an input part and an output part, yes.
>
How much do people use folds?
I don't know, but among the people that I know who do software demos
with TeXmacs, this is quite a popular thing.
>
How do you combine folds with sections? If I want a section/chapter
>
that I can fold away, is it OK to just put a section heading in the
>
fold summary?
We do not really have adequate support for folded _sections_ yet.
>
Finally, I noticed that with a document that includes group-folds
>
nested to third level, where some of the folds are fairly big (but not
>
too big, a couple of sessions that cover, maybe 5-6 screenfuls, no
>
graphics), Certain parts of the document are very slow, where typing
>
gives something like 1 char a second or even less.
>
Does anyone know Why I get this slowness? How to avoid it? Is it the
>
group-folds? Is it too many nested folds?
Folds are not optimized for speed, especially when using varsession,
which is based on tables. I definitely want to do something about
this one day, but probably not sometime soon.
Best wishes, --Joris
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.