First login?
Lost password?
 
 
 
mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

Text archives Help


Re: Conditional definition of Scheme functions and typesetting of trees


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Massimiliano Gubinelli <address@hidden>
  • To: Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden>
  • Cc: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: Conditional definition of Scheme functions and typesetting of trees
  • Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:32:59 +0100
As an example, try to use my macro and then create an equation and enter it
with the cursor, then make "Update all" (Shift+Cmr+R) and you will see that
the value of all the instances of the macro will change to "+++". If now you
go with the cursor on the text and then you do again "Update all", then all
the instances change to "xxxx". This depends where the cursor is, not where
the macro are called. And "Update all" just force TeXmacs to rexpand all the
document from the start.

Best
Max


> On 18. Nov 2020, at 00:29, Massimiliano Gubinelli <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Dear Giovanni,
> my understanding of the matter can be wrong (or not totally correct)
> however is as follows:
>
> 1) In order to display your document, TeXmacs need to transform the
> document tree into a series of boxes which indicate where and what put on
> the screen or on the paper. This transformation go thru several phases, one
> of which is the macro expansion phase, i.e. markup in the document is
> evaluated until primitive markup is reached, which then allows to compute
> boxes and the material which will eventually end up on your screen.
>
> 2) Every time the document is modified, for example by the user editing it
> inserting some text in some position of the document tree, TeXmacs perform
> the computations in 1) to transform the modified document tree into a new
> sequence of rendering instructions.
>
> 3) If you put some \extern markup in the document, then when TeXmacs tries
> to expand that markup it (by definition) goes on by calling the scheme
> procedure and replacing the \extern markup with the result of the scheme
> procedure. Now, the scheme procedure does not have *any* informations on
> where the \extern markup was in the document tree. So scheme cannot know if
> we were in an equation or in a piece of text.
>
> Your confusion is to believe that in-math? returns true in a situation
> where you use \extern inside an equation. This is not true, in my
> understanding.
>
> in-math? is true only if the *editor* is in math mode, that is your cursor
> is inside an equation. This is a global mode of the editor and if it
> happens that your macro is evaluated again at that moment, then the
> predicate returns true, but this does not depend on the position of your
> \extern in the document tree, but on the current position of the cursor at
> the moment TeXmacs tries to recompute that part of the tree.
>
> Maybe this description is not totally correct (I'm not sure how and when
> exaclty TeXmacs goes to a reexpansion of the macros) but seems coherent
> with the bizzare behaviour of your macros.
>
> Also try \extern with a procedure of the form
>
> (define (myfunc) (if (in-math?) "+++" "xxxx")))
> to see how, even when you put it in regular text, you can have "+++" if,
> right away you then enter into math mode.
>
> HTH,
> Max
>
>
>
>> On 17. Nov 2020, at 23:29, Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I am going to answer your previous message (thanks for that by the way)
>> but before that: I do not follow the explanation in this message on the
>> in-math? predicate, I have an idea of what you might mean, but maybe the
>> idea is wrong :-)
>>
>> Let me write it down here.
>>
>> Starting from:
>>
>> "As I open the file, where I have the macro (which calls Scheme code via
>> extern) both inside math and outside math, they are all executed as if in
>> text mode.
>>
>> If I edit one of them, now the predicate in-math? has effect."
>>
>> you say that when I open the file TeXmacs is only typesetting (and
>> therefore uses the default function, as (in math?) returns always #f), but
>> when I am editing TeXmacs knows what I am editing and lets Scheme know. Is
>> it that?
>>
>> The follow-up question in this case is how can I obtain what I want, that
>> is a different function being called ever time the macro is executed, that
>> is also at the opening of the file. The aim seems sensible to me -
>> typesetting something in one way when in math and in one way when in text
>> (as I said above, now it is working when I write/edit, it is not working
>> if I close and open again a document).
>>
>> Besides, doing Document->Update all hangs the document for a one/two
>> minutes (Ubuntu 20.10, I observed it in another document too), makes the
>> macros work well (upright in math, no asterisks, so it is recognizing the
>> math), which is pretty surprising, but destroys the page setup (margins
>> are lost).
>>
>> G.
>>
>>
>> On 17.11.20 22:50, Massimiliano Gubinelli wrote:
>>> Going back to your attempt: I think that the predicate in-math? cannot be
>>> used to check whether the typesetter is working on an equation or not. No
>>> information is passed to Scheme about the internal status of the
>>> typesetter when you call a \extern markup. You can pass informations only
>>> via parameters. So your unitSpacer has no way to know if the evaluation
>>> is inside some math markup or not.
>>>
>>> The predicates in-math?, etc.. are just to check if the editor is in
>>> text, prog, or math mode, for example. Thats is completely separate on
>>> the status of the typesetter.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>>
>>> Max
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 17. Nov 2020, at 19:25, Giovanni Piredda <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I post this here because I think that while being about Scheme in
>>>> TeXmacs is still of general interest. I have found a way of
>>>> circumventing both issues (which may be ok, in case I will ask about
>>>> this in another post) but I am curious to know the reason of the
>>>> behaviours I observe.
>>>>
>>>> First issue.
>>>>
>>>> I have defined a Scheme function with the following:
>>>>
>>>> (tm-define (unitSpacer) ; default, will be used in regular text
>>>> `(hspace "0.5spc"))
>>>> (tm-define (unitSpacer)
>>>> (:require (in-math?))
>>>> "*")
>>>>
>>>> As far as I understand, the first definition is the default and it is
>>>> overridden by the second when I am in math.
>>>>
>>>> In my tests, this happens only in open documents. At the first opening
>>>> of a document, only the first definition is used. Does anyone have a
>>>> hint on what is happening? Developers ;-) ?
>>>>
>>>> ===
>>>>
>>>> Second issue.
>>>>
>>>> In math mode, the program I wrote outputs groups of letters, each
>>>> wrapped in a <with|math-font-shape|right primitive, and interleaved with
>>>> the character "*".
>>>>
>>>> Example of output, copied from the terminal using (display ...)
>>>>
>>>> <tree 2 <with|math-font-shape|right|kg>*<with|math-font-shape|right|m>>
>>>>
>>>> I call this from a TeXmacs macro in math mode and I get a typeset output
>>>> where the asterisk appears as such (while I would like it to be
>>>> interpreted as an implicit multiplication)
>>>>
>>>> If I copy the output from the terminal, strip the outermost <tree
>>>> primitive and place it inside a math primitive (opening the .tm file
>>>> with a text editor) the asterisks do not appear (as I thought they
>>>> shouldn't).
>>>>
>>>> Again, suggestions?
>>>>
>>>>
>


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of page