mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

["address@hidden" <address@hidden>]

Thanks,

i misunderstood the version number ... apologies

MLL

Le samedi 26 mai 2007 à 18:09 -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi a écrit :
> address@hidden wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > since i destroyed the messages about this subject i have to create a new
> > one.
> > 
> > I installed the last testing debian version on a dreamlinux small
> > laptop. This version of exmacs runs as fast as the 1.0.6.9 version i
> > have on my desktop with gnome-etch. I wasreally pleased, because when i
> > first tried texmacs a last year, it was to slow on my poor laptop ...
> > 
> > By the way, when installing this testing version; i thought it would
> > depend on texlive and not tetex (as it is stated when i want to upgrade
> > my etch 1.0.6.9 version), but with dreamlinux (wihc is between stable
> > and testing), it relies on tetex. Is it normal ?
> > 
> > Marc
> 
> In Debian testing we currently have 1.0.6-11 which depends upon tetex.
> However, from 1.0.6.9-3 onwards we updated the dependencies from tetex to
> texlive [1]. Currently Debian unstable contains 1.0.6.10 which also depends
> upon texlive.
> 
> raju
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418660
>