On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:19:10PM -0700, Robert Dodier wrote:
On 1/10/08, Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:05:46PM +0600, Andrey G. Grozin wrote:Joris, I'm sorry, but I can't tell what you mean here.
By the way, what do you all think - if we drop support of *really* ancient[vdhoeven@alcazar src]$ maxima --version
versions of maxima (<=5.9.2), then the scripts can be greatly simplified.
This still leaves a lot of supported versions - 5.9.3 to 5.14.0. Maybe,
it's time to do this?
Maxima 5.9.0
Hmm, when I will buy I need machine ;^)
I meant, when I will buy a new machine (I must have been really tired when
answering).
Can you please say whether you are in favor of the suggestion to
drop support for versions of Maxima up to and including 5.9.2 ??
At the moment not, because my criterion for what is an "old version"
is whether I still use such a version on one of my machines.
I think this is a reasonable criterion for (lazy) users who install
(or get installed) what they need when buying a new computer,
but don't change their installation afterwards.
It's up to you, but it seems like it would be beneficial to TeXmacs
if it did not have to be modified for each new Maxima release.
Another solution might be to simply anticipate some of
the upcoming version numbers ;^)
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.