mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Michael Lachmann <address@hidden>]

You can look a bit back up the list for the discussion. I'm using two
files, I think:
noweb.ts stored in ~/.TeXmacs/styles, and a few key bindings in
~/.TeXmacs/progs/my-init-texmacs.scm

I installed noweb, and maybe that's it. Attached is a sample TeXmacs file.

Tell me if it worked...

Michael

noweb.ts:
--
<TeXmacs|1.0.7.2>

<style|source>

<\body>
  <use-package|jsc|tmdoc-traversal|tmdoc-markup|tmdoc-keyboard>

  <assign|noweb-fragment|<\macro|name|x>

    <\cpp-fragment>

       
\<less\>\<less\><label|<arg|name>><with|color|red|<arg|name>>\<gtr\>\<gtr\>=

      <arg|x>

      @
    </cpp-fragment>
  </macro>>

  
<assign|noweb-ref|<macro|name|\<less\>\<less\><hlink|<arg|name>|<merge|#|<arg|name>>>\<gtr\>\<gtr\>>>

</body>

<\initial>
  <\collection>
    <associate|page-type|letter>
  </collection>
</initial>

<\references>
  <\collection>
  </collection>
</references>
--
The key bindings: in ~/.TeXmacs/progs/my-init-texmacs.scm:
--
(kbd-map
          ("C-1" (make 'noweb-ref))
          ("C-2" (make 'noweb-fragment))
          ("C-9" (choose-file (texmacs-save-buffer "verbatim") "save
verbatim file" "verbatim") )
          )
--
On 16 June 2010 22:23, Sam Liddicott <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 16/06/10 17:18, Michael Lachmann wrote:
>
> On 11 June 2010 18:04, Sam Liddicott <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I really miss latex's lstlistings. I wrote a literate programming addon for
> Lyx (http://www.nongnu.org/newfangle/index.shtml). The weave side was done
> entirely in latex macros and based on lstlistings, and the tangle side was
> done with a single awk script. I see that texmacs replaces tex mostly (fair
> enough, the difficulties in parsing tex drove me to texmacs). I intend to
> port the literate programming to texmacs and implement as xslt and guile.  I
> guess I'll have a lot to do to get lstlistings ported. Mainly it had syntax
> highlighting and line counting, but it had some freaky tricks to approximate
> per-word grids for fake mono-spacing with variable fonts. (I know about
> lp4texmacs).
>
> I've been using texmacs for literate programming over the last year
> with a bunch of hacks.
> There is a small environment for texmacs to install that makes a new
> document class, 'noweb'. The document is exported to verbatim from
> within texmacs, and then I run  notangle on it to get the various
> parts. I haven't implemented a nice make interface as you have. One
> nice feature is that because of texmacs' sessions, at the end of the
> document I have a shell session and a scheme session that I use to
> generate everything. So I don't need to remember how to do stuff.
>
> Inserting a new section is done with ctrl-2, and a link to a prev
> section with ctrl-1. It is nice that once that is done you can easily
> jump between the different parts of the program.
>
> Syntax highlighting of the different languages has to be hard coded
> using cpp for now....
>
> It would really be nice to make it less hacky, add some make
> possibility that recognizes changes, and the possibility to reassemble
> the document from the files so that you can edit your code in whatever
> editor you want....
>
>
> I'm quite excited by the guile/scheme integration, for once it may mean that
> references to other blocks can be expanded, and possibly even edited
> in-situ.
>
> But it seems like the main task will be re-writing lstlistings in scheme. I
> know how the keywording works in lstlistings, by looking for keywords that
> are not in quoted strings, so I think I can do that.
>
> On partially implemented feature in newfangle is automatic contextual
> quoting, so that if a chunk of text is included in a line that begins with
> // that all the lines have // prefixed; or if a chunk of text with a newline
> in is included within a string definition, the newline is replaced with
> \n"<literal-newline>"
>
> and so on; but I found this to be difficult with languages like perl where
> $a=~m/a/; and $a=~s|a/|b/|; are both regex type stuff and quite hard to
> detect where the regex starts and ends; so I can't automatically do such
> stuff in perl; but as the Texmacs editor is so great with it's macro editing
> I can quite easily have the human markup regexes and so-forth and not need
> to automatically detect all of it!
>
> Please could you tell me where to get the literate stuff you have been
> doing?
>
> Sam
>
> --
> Sam's signature

Attachment: hello.tm
Description: Binary data