Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Texmacs gets confused if in the bib file there are "comments"...

The first reference does not get recognized. In one of the documents,
I even have [1] to refer to one article and [1] refer to another...

It all got fixed once I removed the "comments" in the bib file.

I used TeXmacs 1.0.7.13 in Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat.

Attachment: eraseme2.tm
Description: application/extension-tm

This is a bibtex file.  Everything is a comment, except when there is an "at" sign.
I will comment in each bib entry and why that article was relevant for the thesis.
Even if later I choose not to include it.  Writing this commment is important,
since I want to know if TeXmacs reads it correctly...

For example, in which article we can find the "Williams moves"?

@article {anderson98,
    AUTHOR = {Anderson, Jared E. and Putnam, Ian F.},
     TITLE = {Topological invariants for substitution tilings and their
              associated {$C^*$}-algebras},
   JOURNAL = {Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems},
  FJOURNAL = {Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems},
    VOLUME = {18},
      YEAR = {1998},
    NUMBER = {3},
     PAGES = {509--537},
      ISSN = {0143-3857},
   MRCLASS = {46L55 (19K99 37B50 54H20)},
  MRNUMBER = {1631708 (2000a:46112)},
MRREVIEWER = {G. A. Noskov},
       DOI = {10.1017/S0143385798100457},
       URL = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0143385798100457},
}

---

• [TeXmacs] comments in bib files confuse texmacs, Adrian S., 09/23/2011
  • Re: [TeXmacs] comments in bib files confuse texmacs, Jan Lellmann, 09/23/2011
    • Re: [TeXmacs] comments in bib files confuse texmacs, Adrian S., 09/24/2011

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.