Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

That is a good solution, though I wanted to have some comments
regarding all of the .bib file. Erasing the text outside of the
entries easy, and it is probably not TeXmacs fault. I wonder if LaTeX
would also complain about that.

Much more worrisome is the fact that if you have a right reference,
[1], that gets later corrupted by those comments, and then you get a
different, [1], referring to a different article. That is why I
spotted that something was wrong. I think this is mentioned in
TeXmacs-dev...

I have to say that handling references in TeXmacs is much more easier
than in LaTeX, even if one needs to update the document twice... I
like TeXmacs a lot.

Peace.
-Adrian.

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Jan Lellmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> You could add it as "comment = {...}" to the entry. This way it could also
> be correctly displayed in .bib editors such as JabRef.
>
> Jan
>
> On 23.09.2011 20:39, Adrian S. wrote:
>>
>> Texmacs gets confused if in the bib file there are "comments"...
>>
>> The first reference does not get recognized.  In one of the documents,
>> I even  have [1] to refer to one article and [1] refer to another...
>>
>> It all got fixed once I removed the "comments" in the bib file.
>>
>> I used TeXmacs 1.0.7.13 in Ubuntu Maverick Meerkat.
>

---

• [TeXmacs] comments in bib files confuse texmacs, Adrian S., 09/23/2011
  • Re: [TeXmacs] comments in bib files confuse texmacs, Jan Lellmann, 09/23/2011
    • Re: [TeXmacs] comments in bib files confuse texmacs, Adrian S., 09/24/2011

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.