Chronological Thread 

< Chronological >      < Thread >

---

Cool!

I think, though, that the description of both needs to try to get at
the differences between the two. As it currently stands, one could use
the description of either TeXmacs/Lyx, and use it for the other one.

Also, I think TeXmacs isn't anymore an "interfaces to many Computer
Algebra Systems". Look through the list... octave, R, python, (btw,
where is shell and gnuplot in that list?)
I'm not sure what to call it. One could say "as a front end to almost
any program" (???)


Michael

--

On 27 February 2013 14:27, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden> wrote:
> There is a new site for subjective questions to be dealt with in an
> structured fashion, and there's one question (that I posted) that concerns
> TeXmacs:
>
> http://slant.co/topics/what-is-the-best-interactive-typesetter/
>
> You're welcome to chime in and help improve the description of TeXmacs
> there.
>
> Best,
>
> -á.

---

• [TeXmacs] What is the best interactive typesetter?, Alvaro Tejero Cantero, 02/27/2013
  • Re: [TeXmacs] What is the best interactive typesetter?, Michael Lachmann, 02/27/2013
    • Re: [TeXmacs] What is the best interactive typesetter?, François-Xavier Thomas, 02/27/2013
      • Re: [TeXmacs] What is the best interactive typesetter?, Henri Girard, 02/28/2013
        • Re: [TeXmacs] What is the best interactive typesetter?, Paul Zarucki, 02/28/2013

---

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.