mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[François-Xavier Thomas <address@hidden>]

I've said that a lot, but to me the most amazing TeXmacs feature is in the 
shortcuts and visual feedback.

I can enter LaTeX very well in Vim, and in LyX as well, but the shortcuts in 
TeXmacs are so intuitive -- working by similar-looking characters with the 
Tab key is a genius move -- that I always feel like a donkey trying to type 
when I manually enter LaTeX.

Yes, you can interface it with other things, but I have to say I've never 
used that feature. TeXmacs is primarily a document editor for me, so I almost 
always export my graphics manually from other programs.

On Feb 27, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Michael Lachmann wrote:

> Cool!
> 
> I think, though, that the description of both needs to try to get at
> the differences between the two. As it currently stands, one could use
> the description of either TeXmacs/Lyx, and use it for the other one.
> 
> Also, I think TeXmacs isn't anymore an "interfaces to many Computer
> Algebra Systems". Look through the list... octave, R, python, (btw,
> where is shell and gnuplot in that list?)
> I'm not sure what to call it. One could say "as a front end to almost
> any program" (???)
> 
> 
> Michael
> 
> --
> 
> On 27 February 2013 14:27, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <address@hidden> wrote:
>> There is a new site for subjective questions to be dealt with in an
>> structured fashion, and there's one question (that I posted) that concerns
>> TeXmacs:
>> 
>> http://slant.co/topics/what-is-the-best-interactive-typesetter/
>> 
>> You're welcome to chime in and help improve the description of TeXmacs
>> there.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> -á.