mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Alexandre Dezotti <address@hidden>]

Hi,

For the compilation, I do have Guile 2.0, and tried to override this
problem despite me not knowing what I was doing at all. Hence the
error message about Qt.

I have just tried the static binaries, it works fine. I had just to
figure out how to use the \below command (which is straightforward in
source mode).

Indeed, \below\above are just fine!


Now there is a small display issue. I have the following in the body
of my document:

<assign|uni|<big|cup>>

  \;

  <math|<below|<above|<big|cup>|\<infty\>>|i=0>>
  <math|<above|<below|<big|cup>|i=0>|\<infty\>>>

  <math|<below|<above|<value|uni>|\<infty\>>|i=0>>
  <math|<above|<below|<value|uni>|i=0>|\<infty\>>>

  \;

  \;

Compared to the two fist versions, the last ones does not seem to be
centred, as if there were a space just after the cup symbol (screen
shot: http://i.imgur.com/LD4kf6q.png).



Thank you very much !

2014-07-19 12:37 GMT+02:00 Miguel de Benito Delgado <address@hidden>:
> Hi,
>
>   (reposting to the list)
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Alexandre Dezotti
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> * The keyboard works just fine until I insert script above/bellow
>> through the menu, I can see in source mode that the below/above
>> commands are inserted in the source text.
>>
>> * The shortcuts displayed in the menu are Alt+B for bellow, and Alt+A for
>> above.
>>
>> *
>> $ uname -r
>> 3.15.5-1-ARCH
>> $ gnome-shell --version
>> GNOME Shell 3.12.2
>> $ texmacs --version
>> TeXmacs version 1.0.7.21
>> (c) 1999-2013 by Joris van der Hoeven and others
>>
>> I have just learned this version of Texmacs was 1 year old, though it
>> is still the official version for my distribution.
>> I have also tried to get the source from the web and compile it, but
>> it failed. I have probably to set up Qt correctly, which I don't have
>> time to do this.
>
>
> Compilation should work out of the box. You only need to be sure that the
> version of guile you have is 1.8 and NOT 2.0
>
>>  * I see xmodmap is used to translate keyboard inputs, maybe it could
>>
>> work. If I understand well, it would require to type differently than
>> what is expected and displayed on the actual keyboard. I feel it is a
>> bit overkill for this. My solution will be to wait for a new release
>> from Archlinux.
>
>
> Have you tried the static binaries?
>
> http://www.texmacs.org/Download/ftp/tmftp/generic/TeXmacs-1.99.2-i386-pc-linux-gnu-B.tar.gz
>
> or if you have an older glibc:
>
> http://www.texmacs.org/Download/ftp/tmftp/generic/TeXmacs-1.99.2-i386-pc-linux-gnu-A.tar.gz
>
> --
> Miguel de  Benito.
>>
>> 2014-07-18 12:49 GMT+02:00 Miguel de Benito Delgado
>> <address@hidden>:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > * The scripts above/below *do* work, but then you have problems with the
>> > keyboard, right?
>> > * What's the shortcut displayed next to Script->script above/below?
>> > * What is your TeXmacs version and system?
>> > * If you are running Linux, couldn't you use Xmodmap to avoid this
>> > conflict?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Miguel de  Benito.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Alexandre Dezotti
>> > <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for your answer. Unfortunately, this does not work.
>> >> When I use Insert->script->script bellow (or above), and then stroke
>> >> "\" it produces a lower script. It does this every time I stroke
>> >> backslash in any mathematical context. Thus I cannot enter command any
>> >> more.
>> >> In normal context (text) the backlash is interpreted as "_". This is
>> >> probably related to the fact that backslash, on my keyboard is
>> >> produced by hitting "alt gr" and "_" as the same time.
>> >> I have to restart texmacs to have normal behaviour again.
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Alexandre.
>> >>
>> >> 2014-07-17 17:41 GMT+02:00 Miguel de Benito Delgado
>> >> <address@hidden>:
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Alexandre Dezotti
>> >> > <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The subscript and superscript won't go under and above the symbol.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Is there a way to make this work?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't know, but there has to be since superscripts for some symbols
>> >> > are
>> >> > interpreted as "script above".
>> >> >
>> >> > In any case, this motivates the workaround, which should provide
>> >> > reasonably
>> >> > good results in your case (union/intersection/etc), of using
>> >> > Insert->Script->Script above (or the corresponding shortcut, ctrl+A
>> >> > in
>> >> > my
>> >> > setup).
>> >> >
>> >> > Best,
>> >> > --
>> >> > Miguel de  Benito.
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>
>