mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Karl Hegbloom <address@hidden>]

I have binary bulids for Ubuntu Yakkety at https://github.com/KarlHegbloom/texmacs/releases that you may like to try. Also see https://github.com/KarlHegbloom/zotero-texmacs-integration

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017, 09:05 David G. Wonnacott <address@hidden> wrote:

I just did a fresh Ubuntu install, and downloaded TeXmacs 1.99.5, and it crashes right away.

I fetched the image for Ubuntu 16.04 from the ubuntu web site, did the following installation

sudo apt-get install gnome-tweak-tool
sudo apt-get install g++ bison flex ghc

I then remapped my keyboard the way I like it (left-handed mouse, Dvorak keyboard, swap control and caps-lock), and then fetched TeXmacs from the TeXmacs web site, un-tar'ed it, and did this:

davew@davew:~$ PATH=$PATH:/home/davew/TeXmacs-1.99.5-10549M-i386-pc-linux-gnu/bin
davew@davew:~$ export PATH
davew@davew:~$ TEXMACS_PATH=/home/davew/TeXmacs-1.99.5-10549M-i386-pc-linux-gnu
davew@davew:~$ export TEXMACS_PATH

and then started TeXmacs on the command-line, clicked Document->Page... to pop up a second window (page configuration), hit "OK" in that window.

At that point, TeXmacs crashed.

This is on an i7-2600S with 8G of RAM, though I've had this problem on lots of other systems.

Please let me know if this can't be reproduced. I could try it again on the "Try Ubuntu" boot disk, without gnome-tweak-tool, if there's any thought that doing so might have an impact.

Dave W

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Karl Hegbloom <address@hidden> wrote:

If you apply my patch to the texmacs wrapper script, and make sure that the debugging symbols are installed, then you can run it in a terminal or emacs shell buffer, or even under gud with "texmacs --gdb" and it will be launched under gdb. Without the debugging symbols though, it won't give a good result.

I posted the patch in my last bug report on Savannah. I can't access it right now to put a copy into this email because the drive that has my source directory on it is not presently in the caddy; I've got a Windows disk in there so that I can work on upgrading the firmware in my Android tablet today.

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 11:14 AM David G. Wonnacott <address@hidden> wrote:

I've been telling my students to use Ubuntu and pull the ancient version
of TeXmacs from there. It pre-dates the current issue.

I'll try to generate a crash with a back-trace. It's really with my
1.99.5 install on Ubuntu ... just close one of two windows.

Dave W



On 09/26/2016 12:09 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> In the recent years there were a few reports in the bug tracker
> regarding TeXmacs crashing. Many of them are related to using several
> windows (when you say working with several buffers, is it in a single
> window?).
>
> In my experience (using linux), TeXmacs crashes much less than what you
> describe (except when hacking in scheme, but that doesn't count!).
> However -somewhat corroborating your observations- I rarely have more
> than two buffers open, I never use the drawing tool nor the replace tool
> in math mode. I do have a number of images linked (*not* embedded) in my
> documents, though.
>
> I doubt the problems you encounter are specific to MacOS, and therefore
> running TeXmacs in a virtual machine would probably only make your life
> more complicated. OTOH I think you should try the newest version. As far
> as I can tell it is not less stable than 1.99.4. In case of doubt,
> backing up/restoring the old installation is as simple as renaming a
> folders.
>
>> I was just wondering how often TeXMacs freezes for you all, and
>> whether I should invest some time into trying to fix things
> If you could help ironing out these nasty crashes, that would be
> extremely welcome. Good bug reports for reproducible crashes, or crashes
> with backtraces would be nice.
>
>
>> I would also like to know how much effort would be required to make
>> TeXMacs a really robust piece of software. In particular, would anyone
>> have an order of magnitude estimate of the financial cost?
> For this, Joris may have an idea. You should directly get in touch with him.
>
> best,
> Philippe
>
>
>