mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Frank <address@hidden>]

Hi all,

I have another suggestion: could we think of "breaking the table"? The 
preceding example to mix some content between several equations is a special case of 
this. Another example, which does not seem to be supported by TeXmacs currently, is the 
following: when you write a letter, by default, TeXmacs will right align the source 
address, the date and the signature. However, according to the following instruction

https://www.lexico.com/grammar/letter-formats-block-modified-block-and-semi-block

the section "modified block format", these "right flushed elements" should be 
left aligned to a same vertical line. I suppose that this could be done by breaking the unified 
table and insert the contents.

Best wishes,
Frank

On 12/3/20, TeXmacs wrote:
> Hi Giovanni,
>
> This is a bit tricky, but you essentially did write.
> You should set the right padding of the interspersed text to zero and
> then specify a tiny exact width for the cell that contains it.
> In Format -> Cell, you may also want to specify 'block content'.
> The decorations while editing are somewhat bugged though.
>
> Best wishes, --Joris
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:40:43PM +0100, Giovanni Piredda wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > as in the object: how do I write aligned equations with text in
> > between? To add an example, I would like to do the same that one
> > does with \intertext in LaTeX.
> >
> > I have tried this: within "several equations" add a row below the
> > line which I want to comment, join the three cells, write.
> >
> > In this way the text (written using the text primitive) is part of
> > the alignment of the equations (it moves the = signs to the right,
> > as the texts are longer than all of the LHSs of the equations), and
> > I do not want this. Ideas to correct this, or other ideas?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Giovanni