mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Massimiliano Gubinelli <address@hidden>]

Dear Rudolf,

 I think we do not have some user-friendly alternative to that, yet. Personally I peruse tables inside usual equation environments and this works very well, but I would like more semantically meaningful environments. Maybe not those of amsmath but at least similar in spirit. I essentially never use the standard multi-eq environment. 

You can easily make macros which creates tables with the kind of spacing you like.

I put here:

some of my papers. Not claiming that they are perfect, but there you have a lot of multiline equations and you can check what I’m doing with them. 

Another quite complex paper is this from Gennady:

2205.09851

PDF Document · 1.3 MB

and of course you can check what Joris is doing in his papers. There are a lot of them (with sources) at his webpage.

Max

On 23 Jan 2023, at 10:51, Rudolf Sykora <address@hidden> wrote:

Dear list,


please, how is it currently with the possibility to use the
amsmath-like environments (split, align, gather, ...).  I
was writing some math yesterday and realized the formatting
within the default multi-equation environment was 1) not
flexible enough, 2) basically 'wrong' around equal signs
(too much space put there). Can I somehow use amsmath-like
envireonments? But for some old warning in the documentation
saying to not use such environments, I could not find any
help.

Thanks for any comments and thank you for your work.
(It's much more fun/pleasure to use texmacs in place of
a simple text editor to typeset a lot of math.)


Best regards,
Ruda