mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Phil Mendelsohn <address@hidden>]

On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 03:35:21PM +0200, Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote:
> Wayan <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> The strongest argument is I think the typesetting quality. This is a
> >> good argument to the normal user and especially for the
> >> mathematicians.
> >
> > The type setting quality is similar, isn't it? Do you see different
> > quality between LyX/TeXmacs/LaTeX? I think this not strong argument.
> 
> No, there is no difference I could see. 

There is a difference I can see.  I'm only using version v1.0.0.1, and
I'm a mathematics person, so maybe I'm particular, but the interline
spacing is often too small in TeXmacs.  There are some other issues
with accents, too.

It's miles better than a word-processor, and not a bad typesetter, but
there are details that Knuth et al. have smoothed out over the last 20
years.  I think we'll get there too.

Phil Mendelsohn

-- 
"To misattribute a quote is unforgivable." -- Anonymous