Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

texmacs-users - Re: ispell with ngerman

Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

List archive

Re: ispell with ngerman


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
  • To: Jan Ulrich Hasecke <address@hidden>
  • Cc: address@hidden
  • Subject: Re: ispell with ngerman
  • Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 11:40:44 +0100 (MET)


> I swear it does not work! ;-)

I believe you, but I try to figure out why...

> >> ispell -d deutsch Text.txt
> >
> > Now I get very confused, because this is exactly the way ispell is being
> > called (together with an -a option for interactivity), as the output
> > in your terminal should tell you by the way.
>
> So, maybe there is something wrong with the pipe.
>
> Mh, I just tried to work interactively with ispell on the commandline
> and it does not recognize umlauts anymore.
>
> Even when I start it with
>
> ispell -a -w äöüÄÖÜß -d ngerman Test1.txt
>
> it think that König, Mücke or Gruß are mispelled.
>
> But it recognizes umlauts, when they are written in this way:
>
> Ko"nig, Mu"cke, GrusS

Yes, I noticed the same thing for Spanish.

> So I think that when you start it with -a all "illegal" characters must be
> converted in this way in order to get spellchecking right.

The problem is that aspell *does* recognize these characters
in the right way...

Anybody knows of a reliable test in order to know whether
the ispell/aspell program on a random system uses the iso-latin1
encoding or the fancy above encoding?




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page