mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[Jan Ulrich Hasecke <address@hidden>]

Joris,

I swear it does not work! ;-)

Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden> writes:

>> ispell -d deutsch Text.txt
>
> Now I get very confused, because this is exactly the way ispell is being
> called (together with an -a option for interactivity), as the output
> in your terminal should tell you by the way.

So, maybe there is something wrong with the pipe. 

Mh, I just tried to work interactively with ispell on the commandline
and it does not recognize umlauts anymore. 

Even when I start it with 

ispell -a -w äöüÄÖÜß -d ngerman Test1.txt

it think that König, Mücke or Gruß are mispelled.

But it recognizes umlauts, when they are written in this way:

Ko"nig, Mu"cke, GrusS

So I think that when you start it with -a all "illegal" characters must be
converted in this way in order to get spellchecking right.

Ciao!
juh

-- 
Gerade ein Konstruktivist, der die sog. Realitaet fuer subjektiv
konstruiert haelt, muss auf einem verbindlichen normativen Kontext
bestehen, und der waere hier: Krieg als Mittel der Politik war immer
und ist ein Unding! (W.H. in der Mailingliste PhilWeb)