Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>- To: Luca <address@hidden>
- Cc: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:15:25 +0100 (CET)
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Luca wrote:
> >"blah.tm~". But things may go wrong when you change permissions or
> >when the directory which contains your file is physically moved.
>
> I figured out what happend.....
> The directory I was working was mounted remotely via nfs through the
> automount daemon and got unmounted while I was working.
> So Texmacs directly saved the file and its autosaved version under the
> mountpoint on the local disk and when I again opened the directory
> through nautilus after the crash the automounter mounted the remote
> disk again and I didn't see any file...
> I guess that Texmacs doesn't lock the directory on which it works so
> automounter automatically unmount it after 10 minutes of inactivity,
> probably it is also related to the fact I opened the file through
> nautilus and the pwd of texmacs was the default one and not the one in
> which the file was.
> I don't know if it is a feature or a bug.
TeXmacs currently just stores the complete file name and tries to
write to it when saving. I think this is the most natural behaviour,
but we might issue a clearly visible warning if something "strange"
happened (to be defined more precisely).
More generally, we should probably use popup windows for really
important messages. I think that many people do not keep an eye
on the status bar.
> So the story has an happy end....
> Now the question is:
> Is there any way to inform texmacs that the directory you are opening
> the file from is on a remote server so that if it is unmounted it warns
> you and you can save to another location? OR should it lock the
> directory to prevent the automounter demon from unmounting it? Or
> should the pwd of Texmacs when opened from nautilus or similar programs
> be set to the one of the opened file?
Something like this should probably be implemented indeed.
> PS
> I really hope you will forget the subject of my first message as "really
> disappointed" sound to me wrong. THis doesn't correspond to the feeling
> I have for TeXmacs as since I discovered it I found it incredibly
> necessary for my work and fantastic. However surely you know how one
> feels after loosing a day of work when already out of schedule...
> I love TeXmacs and trust it so much that I thought it wasn't possible
> what seemed to have happened and in fact after trying to figure all the
> possiblities out I stopped the automounter daemon and discovered the files.
The main thing is that your problem is solved now.
This really would have been a very bad bug.
> Thank you for your suggestions hope at least this can help to other in
> similar situations
Thanks for reporting your experience, Joris
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Joris van der Hoeven, 02/01/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Luca, 02/01/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Joris van der Hoeven, 02/01/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Lionel Elie Mamane, 02/05/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Corey Sweeney, 02/05/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Kai Sattler, 02/07/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Corey Sweeney, 02/05/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Lionel Elie Mamane, 02/05/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Joris van der Hoeven, 02/01/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Norbert Nemec, 02/01/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Corey Sweeney, 02/01/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Joris van der Hoeven, 02/01/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Norbert Nemec, 02/02/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] very disappointed, Luca, 02/01/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.