mailing-list for TeXmacs Users

[M Singh <address@hidden>]

On Wednesday 09 February 2005 14:15, John P Daigle wrote:
> Um... because it exports damn near flawlessly to LaTex, which is what
> the conferences take, and it makes better documents than word? Is this
> a trick question?
>
> >> Why would anyone want to use texmacs, excellently designed as it is,
> >> when almost every journal/conference that I am aware of uses LaTeX /
> >> Word (a few wordperfect friendly organizations are still out there,
> >> but they are a dying breed).


No. Many conferences and nearly all journals have their own .cls and .sty 
files. Which texmacs does not work with directly, unless someone has 
painstakingly manually translated each style file into a texmacs template.