Subject: mailing-list for TeXmacs Users
List archive
From : Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas <address@hidden>- To: address@hidden
- Subject: Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:24:27 +0000
M Singh wrote:
[...]
Do you mean like talking about the "reality" of Privative software 15 years ago and talking about the "utopia" of Free Software. That talk bring us here.
True. But what I am speaking about is reality, not some utopia where things ought to be different (and I agree with you on the conception of that utopia).
[...]
I understand the point of placing your self in the place of the final user of texmacs (for example academical teachers and journal publishers), but even if you have to think like them, you dont have to think _by_ them. When I was an student I can present most of my academical work to teachers in texmacs, now I sugest to my students and some of them are fine with it, and we are sugesting students and teachers to switch their mind about academical writing using texmacs, and now they're more people using it and interested in this tool in various universities, even we're making some courses about texmacs use. People are diferent, so may be in your experience its not valuable to _suggest_ your advisor anything, in my experience that sugestion had work, but of course acepting a sugestion is up to the listener.Because otherwise, to state it frankly, to expect that by
some magic, some people who don't need it would nevertheless
start working on a good TeXmacs -> LaTeX translator is a
little bit like, I would say, expecting to find an hypothetical fish
who would understand how to fly, or an hypothetical bird who
would understand how to swim : such animals exist, but you
don't see them very often 8-)
But such are the usual thoughts of a person who just wants to communicate the results of his research, and not make the choice of editors and their myriad interactions the subject of his research instead. Such creatues not only exist, but thrive in the academic world in great numbers and overwhelming proportions.
Cheers,
Offray
______________________________
Este mensaje ha sido revisado por un sistema antivirus, por lo que su
contenido está libre de virus.
This e-mail has been scanned by an antivirus system, so its contents is free
of viruses.
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, (continued)
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Henri Lesourd, 02/09/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, M Singh, 02/09/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Stephane Popinet, 02/09/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, M Singh, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Henri Lesourd, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, M Singh, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Henri Lesourd, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Bas Spitters, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, David Mézerette, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, M Singh, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Henri Lesourd, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas, 02/16/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Bas Spitters, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Corey Sweeney, 02/10/2005
- [no subject], John P Daigle, 02/11/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Stephane Popinet, 02/09/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, John P Daigle, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, M Singh, 02/10/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, M Singh, 02/09/2005
- Re: [TeXmacs] conversion to openoffice?, Henri Lesourd, 02/09/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.